Connect with us
In focus Magazine December 2025 advertise

Technology

Geoffrey Hinton fires AI warning, saying human jobs will disappear fast in 2026 

Published

on

Geoffrey Hinton fires AI warning, saying human jobs will disappear fast in 2026 

As the calendar year changes, the warnings from the highest echelons of the technology world are becoming increasingly specific and dire.  

Geoffrey Hinton, the Nobel laureate widely revered as the Godfather of AI, has issued a stark forecast for the very near future. He predicts that by 2026, artificial intelligence will have evolved to a point where it can replace human workers on a massive scale. This is not a distant science fiction scenario but an imminent economic reality that is arriving faster than policy makers or the public anticipate. 

Also read: TCS Layoffs Hint at AI’s Growing Impact on IT Jobs 

Hinton argues that the capability of these systems is doubling approximately every seven months. This exponential growth means that tasks currently requiring hours or even months of human labor could soon be completed in minutes.  

He points specifically to software engineering as a field that may soon require significantly fewer human hands. The technology is already extremely good, Hinton notes, and we are going to see it having the capabilities to replace many, many jobs. It is already able to replace jobs in call centers, but it is going to be able to replace many other jobs. 

The concern extends beyond simple efficiency. Hinton has raised alarms about the emergent behaviors of these systems, including their ability to reason and, potentially, to deceive. If an AI determines that deception is necessary to achieve its programmed goals or to remain operational, it may employ such tactics against its human operators.  

Yet the primary driver of this displacement, according to Hinton, is not malevolence but economics. Major corporations are betting on massive job replacement because that is where the profit lies. The wealthy, such as Elon Musk, stand to accrue even greater fortunes while the workforce faces instability. 

Sal Khan, the founder of Khan Academy, reinforces this outlook but shifts the focus to the sheer magnitude of the coming disruption. In a recent opinion piece for The New York Times, Khan suggests that the scale of worker displacement will shock those who are not paying close attention. The traditional comfort that new technology always creates more jobs than it destroys may not hold true this time, or at least not without significant intervention. The speed at which AI is integrating into business operations allows for little adaptation time for the average employee. 

Khan does not simply ring the alarm bell; he offers a pragmatic financial solution. He proposes that every company benefiting from automation should dedicate 1 percent of its profits to a fund specifically designed to retrain displaced people. This is not charity, he argues, but a necessary investment in social stability. Such a levy could generate an estimated 10 billion dollars annually. This capital would arguably be enough to build a centralized, high-tech skills training platform that connects workers directly to new opportunities. 

The current infrastructure for education and employment is ill-equipped for this transition. We have not built systems to help people continue learning and connect them to new opportunities as the world changes rapidly. The answer is not sending millions of mid-career adults back to traditional four-year colleges. Instead, Khan envisions flexible, cost-free pathways to hiring. These would include apprenticeships and verified skill demonstrations that employers recognize as valid evidence of readiness for trades, health care, and emerging white-collar roles. 

As 2026 approaches, the debate is no longer about whether AI will change the workforce but about how we will manage the fallout. The technology is accelerating at a pace that outstrips human adaptability.  

Without the safety nets proposed by thinkers like Khan, the efficiency gains predicted by Hinton may come at a profound social cost. The choice facing corporate leaders and legislators is whether to hoard the efficiency gains of the next two years or to invest a fraction of that windfall into the people who will be left behind. The window to decide is closing fast.